Wakanda joins Coco, Zootopia, and Encanto on Disney Parks' future blue sky expansion list, reveals Josh D'Amaro

By WDWMAGIC Staff · Tuesday September 19, 2023 11:30am ET · "Walt Disney Imagineering"

Speaking to the New York Times today, Disney Parks Chairman Josh D'Amaro widened the blue sky wish list even further to include Wakanda from Marvel's Black Panther.

"Imagine bringing Wakanda to life," D'Amaro said. "In terms of bringing the latest Disney-Marvel-Pixar intellectual property to the parks, we haven't come close to scratching the surface. And we have learned that incorporating Disney I.P. increases the return on investment significantly."

Disney has recently changed tact on how it discusses plans for new attractions and is now openly discussing blue sky projects before they are even green-lit. At one time, the first anyone would know of a new Disney attraction was when steel was spotted rising from the ground.

D'Amaro first revealed blue sky plans for Walt Disney World at D23 Expo in 2022, where he outlined plans for Moana and Zootopia attractions at Disney's Animal Kingdom, with Encanto and Coco moving into the Magic Kingdom. A year later, at Destination D23, he revealed updated plans, which have seen Moana canceled, Zootopia moved to a smaller project at Tree of Life theater, and Encanto and Indiana Jones taking over DinoLand U.S.A. None of these projects are green-lit, but whatever is built will come from Disney's movie intellectual properties.

Walt Disney Imagineering has gone through a massive period of transformation in recent years, with the on-and-off move to Lake Noana in Florida, the departure of key Imagineers and leaders, and now the return of its former head, Bruce Vaughn.

Disney today announced a $60 billion expenditure plan for Disney, Parks, Experiences, and Products over the next ten years, with at least $17 billion of that earmarked for Walt Disney World.

Disney CEO Bob Iger said in an email today, "The growth trajectory is very compelling if we do nothing beyond what we have already committed. By dramatically increasing our investment - building big, being ambitious, maintaining quality and high standards and using our most popular I.P. - it will be turbocharged."

Conversation

443 comments
Discuss on the Forums
Sounds like Hollywood Studios next expansion.
What is Iger smoking? They’ve announced nothing for WDW and Paris’ expansion is constantly getting scaled back.
I wonder if they know they own older films too
↩ replying to wdwmagic
Yay, more construction walls and, based on the record to date, more underwhelming results.
↩ replying to bmr1591
You mean replacement for RnRC and Launch Bay with a modest expansion inbetween? That’s the next major area of development there. But it’s a ways off and the IP could change 8 times.
↩ replying to WaltsTreasureChest
This is the same company that announced an attraction based on Mary Poppins Returns, have announced architecture in that new community thing will be based on Incredibles 2, and continue to advertise Disney Plus with stuff like She-Hulk and live action Pinocchio.

They really do seem to have this bizarre idea that they don't have anything worthwhile older than a decade.

(Not that all listed things ARE worthwhile.)
Wonder if they are digging this back out for the WoL pavilion?
So is this going to be Disney’s new strategy going forward. “Announcing” things they are potentially working on but not even officially planned.
" And we have learned that incorporating Disney I.P. increases the return on investment significantly." - D'Amaro

Well, guess we shouldn't hold our breath for a nice new, IP-less attraction
Leaked video of Disney executives and imagineering trying to figure out what IP to put into parks and how to do it:
I don't get some of these decisions, by no means do I think Encanto, Coco, and Wakanda will ever have the staying power of something like Frozen or Beauty and the Beast. It's like adding Jack Sparrow into POTC, which to me was cool at the time but I think his time should be up now. It's sad I will never be able to experience the ride in its original presentation ever again.

I'm all for moving forward, but why does everything have to be an IP nowadays? What happened to the company that made DisneySea just 20 years ago? Are the newer generation of imagineers just not capable of crafting an original area anymore? I just don't get it.
↩ replying to tanc
Regardless of the WDI talent at the moment, the use of I.P. is coming from above. At the top level it is I.P. or nothing, and all about Return on Investment.
↩ replying to tanc
They're desperate to put DEI in their parks.
That's the only drive.
↩ replying to wdwmagic
Thus, I think Indy is a more solid lock than some feel. Dinosaur is unpopular, it needs fixing, Indy is a popular IP with staying power, it would be relatively cheap and popular. So, it passes the IP requirement and has strong ROI for the risk-averse.

Beyond Big Thunder is far more risky and, I imagine, will need to bake for awhile before getting like $3 billion. Or it’ll be like WDSP expansion—huge space for 1 bigger ride and a C ticket.
Wakanda would be awesome in HS as a land. Those films are amongst the most popular both critically and commercially of the MCU, and the culture/world that Ryan Coogler, Chadwick Boseman, Hannah Beachler, Ludwig, Ruth Carter, etc carved out deserves to be immortalized in physical form for guests to visit.