Disney's partially completed cruise ship purchase was reportedly acquired at a bargain price

KeithVH21 days ago

Getting on at 'Diego isn't any better🤪. And Galveston can be right up there with them.

C33Mom22 days ago

Embarkation keeps getting better as we work our way up the loyalty tier list (though having to remember the exact date you can check in and race through it is annoying, I think by Gold level it’s lower stakes now that they stagger check-in time). Disembarking has been very unpleasant (more than an hour from attempting to get off the ship to clearing customs) at least 2 of our 6 cruises and run of the mill inefficient (say 30-60m) another 3 times, with only once off the ship and straight to immigration line without waiting more than 20m for the Disney portion. I know that some of it is out of Disney’s control, but we getting off Wish and Fantasy in Port Canaveral means waiting to get off the ship, then they queue us again in the terminal before we can get our bags, then there’s often several switchbacks to get to the immigration desk. Port Everglades/Miami has been middle outcomes, and the Wonder at San Diego was awful getting off the ship and then queuing the whole way through the terminal. I have done dozens of non-Disney cruises in Florida and did not experience the same issue more than 2x all the other times combined. I know some of it is luck and disembarkation habits— I think if you’re willing to wake early and get off a DCL ship before the first breakfast concludes it goes a lot smoother.

peter1143522 days ago

With the exception of San Diego following a repositioning cruise, I’ve never had any challenges with embarkation/disembarkation.

C33Mom22 days ago

We enjoy DCL, but of the 10+ lines we’ve sailed (from Carnival to Seabourn) they are among the worst at embarkation/disembarkation…I’m not looking forward to trying to get on and off this giant ship…but we love Singapore and we will almost certainly give this ship a shot during it’s inaugural year, unless they decide to allow smoking throughout the ship.

Stitch's Grandfather24 days ago

I'm not sure about that. If they treat this ship like another park, the ship IS the destination. Very different strategy, I agree. Would signal that DCL is not about cruising to new places and more about curated Disney experiences the entire voyage.

BrianLo25 days ago

I would strongly presume the cruises go to Penang and Ph-uket (really don’t know why the forum wants to censor that one). But maybe we’ll actually see some itinerary variety. All cruises to nowhere would be unusually shocking. Royal doesn’t really offer Asian itineraries of value either, IMO. They are all quite short and basic.

Stitch's Grandfather29 days ago

Agreed, they're making the ship more of the destination. And it looks like it'll have a lot of typical park-like attractions: an AquaMouse, a rollercoaster, and maybe even a flowrider. Going to be the most park-like ship in the fleet by far. And that's just one portion of the top decks where all this will be located.

MoonRakerSCM29 days ago

I haven't dug too much into the details of this thing (if there that many yet). But I think this is either really smart on Disney's part or really stupid if it doesnt work. I see this... Disney wants to tap in the huge SE asian market. For a multitude of reasons, they're not willing to build infrastructure in Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok etc... But seeing this 'theme park map' style presentation of the boat... I think they're trying to tap into the market by bringing a hybrid cruise/Disney 'park' to the region. No destinations/ports, the destination IS the boat and its experiences/attractions... If this is the case, they can have it in the region for a few years, then move as needed to other regions where there's market potential but not enough for investing in infrastructure. Just my thoughts.

Stitch's Grandfather29 days ago

Agreed that the language very much suggests cruises to nowhere. Very much an emphasis on magic days at sea. Plural. Elsewhere Disney uses the singular like "Pixar Day at Sea".

DCLcruiser29 days ago

The language makes it sound like a cruise to nowhere. Then again, the best days on a DCL itinerary are the Days at Sea. I am not really sure where they could go. Thailand? Indonesia isn't safe, the South China Sea is a mine field, Vietnam is communist, Cambodia is a political powder keg. Not that the Caribbean is really that great (besides Grand Cayman).

Disone29 days ago

Idk. Both Royal Caribbean with Quantum of the Seas and Norwegian Cruise line with the Norwegian Joy thought the same thing. Both Built those ships specifically for the Asian market only to pull them out of that market fairly quickly. The Disney adventure is even bigger than both of those ships.

Stitch's Grandfather29 days ago

Given how much DCL concentrates on the Bahamas, in order for DCL to actually branch out a bit, it seems they'd need 15+ ships. Which I don't think they'll ever hit. So I don't believe they'll ever have a 2nd ship in the region.

Stitch's Grandfather29 days ago

It feels like even the North America itineraries seem to echo the same thought: the ship is the destination, not the port stops. It's almost like DCL thinks they're worried they're just a tour guide and they need to be something vaguely more. So it's quite frustrating. The Adventure was the one ship I really thought I'd be booking, but there's zero chance if they dole out exclusively uninspiring itineraries.

Indy_UK29 days ago

I get why they are doing 3 and 4 night cruises because the demand for a Disney ship there is high. 7 nights would be cool but maybe once they add a 2nd ship. In the next years 10 years I still plan to do all the Asian parks and will try and add a cruise onto that trip too