B
Doesn't this come under "Courtesy " ?
W
“FIFTH KEY MEANS FIFTH GATE”
🤪 😂🤣
D
I thought the four keys were Money, Money, Money, Money? ;)
M
I’m personally interested to see where on the pecking order it falls. The keys are presented as Safety, Courtesy, Show, Efficiency because that is the order in which they are intended to be followed in the event that one must be sacrificed.
M
Ironic that WDW is talking about inclusion when it is one of the most well known places for pricing so many people out.
M
↩ replying to GYKid75Think about what Disney does for those with disabilities (and Disney does *a lot*). Well, most of that is mandated by the ADA. And so, there are legal mandates for inclusion when it comes to people with disabilities.
But that's different from 'courtesy.' If there was no legal mandate and Disney didn't want to do anything out of the ordinary for people with disabilities, then Disney could very courteously say to people with disabilities, "Oh, so sorry, we can't accommodate you." That's being courteous while being excluding.
But for Disney, only safety outranks inclusion for people with disabilities.
"Inclusion" is a reminder not to be exclusive and discriminatory.
M
↩ replying to RobWDW1971By reminding themselves that there are also female popcorn vendors.
M
↩ replying to durangojimDon't forget ze popcorn vendors.
C
It is a bit funny that they're launching an "inclusion" key at the same time that they're limiting who gets into their parks. I get where they're going with it, but it's still a bit funny in a not so great way.
T
The company has long been known as inclusive, and it feels like a token corporate buzzword that already falls within “Courtesy.” I’m not one to beat the “woke” drum because it quickly dissolves into a political discussion, but at some point we have to ask if we’re addressing real issues or imaginary ones. There is no blanket answer; it depends on each company and its existing culture.
As I’ve said before, I’ve served on diversity committees, and in my experience, most volunteers were people who created problems and imagined issues everywhere they looked. They weren’t interested in true resolutions; they just wanted their personal opinions to be mandates.
I hope this is a harmless corporate buzzword.
H
↩ replying to CJRI'm not exactly sure if you understand what inclusion means in this particular circumstance. We are talking D&I here.
C
↩ replying to TJ VazquezI know what it means. Hence I said "I get where they're going with it."
What I meant must've went over your head and that's ok, because it's not really important. It's just funny timing, that is all.
T
↩ replying to danlb_2000You are close. 1. Money, 2. More Money, 3. Even More Money, 4. All the Money.