DeSantis' Central Florida Tourism Oversight District reveals its latest plans for scrapping Disney World Annual Pass benefits for its employees

Sep 27, 2023 in "Reedy Creek Improvement District"

Posted: Wednesday September 27, 2023 6:48pm ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

In a meeting of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board this evening, CEO Glen Gilzean revealed his latest plan to replace the Walt Disney World Annual Pass benefit given to its employees.

District employees will be given a stipend of $3000, which can be used to purchase Walt Disney World Annual Passes for the employee and family members if desired.

Gilzean said, "District Leadership ultimately determined that $3,000 was the actual cost of purchasing the equivalent pass benefits currently held by most employees."

The stiped figure announced today is an increase from the original $1000 proposed at a previous meeting. Walt Disney World Annual Passes range in price from $400 to $1400 per person, depending on the tier of pass chosen.

Board member Peri said of the stipend increase, "We like most of our employees initially understood that the passes were standard third party passes and we set the value accordingly. We have since discovered that the passes and their features were much more than that and were in fact designed for people who are committed to servicing and supporting the parks, not merely for attendees."

Employees will receive the stipend ninety days from the date of hire post the probationary period. The stipend will be issued annually and is subjected to tax withholdings and budget appropriations. Retirees, depending on their age and years of service, are eligible, with variations in eligibility for spouses of deceased employees or retirees. Unless re-adopted, the policy will expire in two fiscal years from October 1, 2023.

The removal of the Walt Disney World Annual Pass benefit follows the Ron DeSantis-appointed board receiving a bill from Walt Disney World for $2.5 million in theme park tickets and discounts given to employees of the district.

Here is the full wording of the new policy.

EMPLOYEE & RETIREE BENEFITS STIPEND (ANNUAL ADMISSION PASS) PROGAM
1. POLICY
Pursuant to a previous agreement with Walt Disney World, the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District
provided an annual Walt Disney World Admission Pass to eligible employees and retirees. The annual
admission pass was a privilege and not a vested right of employees or retirees. The pass program was
reviewed periodically and was subject to revision or cancellation in whole or in part at the discretion of
the District. Based on the sunsetting of the admission pass program referenced in the Benefits section of
the 2011 Employee Policy Manual, the District will instead offer an annual stipend based on the following
policy terms.
2. LIMITATIONS
The annual stipend is a privilege and not a vested right of employees or retirees. It is reviewed periodically
and is subject to revision or cancellation in whole or in part at the discretion of the District. Stipends in
no way guarantee admission to parks or events and do not include or provide access to any theme park,
restaurant, destination, hotel, or merchandise discount. The annual stipend in no way obligates recipients
of the stipend to purchase Walt Disney World Admission Passes or any other products or services.
Recipients of the stipend may use the stipend for any legal purpose they choose in their discretion.
This policy applies to employees of the District unless the employee is covered by a collective bargaining
agreement (CBA) which has provisions that specifically address these matters and differs from this policy.
Nothing in this policy is intended to, nor shall it limit any inherent management rights of the District in
any CBA. In the event that a specific provision of a CBA is inconsistent with this policy, the provision
contained in the CBA shall prevail for covered bargaining unit employees. Otherwise, this policy shall apply
according to its terms and conditions to all employees of the District, unless and until superseded by action
of the District to modify, replace and/or cancel the policy/program/plan, or, unless expressly contradicted
by a specific provision of a CBA, or, unless superseded by law. The amount of the annual stipend is subject
to annual budgeting and appropriations by the District Board of Supervisors.
The Employee & Retiree Benefits Stipend policy sunsets at the completion of two fiscal years beginning
October 1, 2023, unless re-adopted prior to its expiration by the Board of Supervisors. The sunsetting of
stipends does not reinstate the Annual Admission Pass policy.
3. POLICY DETAIL
3.1 District Administration will be responsible for the administration of this policy.
3.2 Employee Eligibility and Distribution
3.2.1 All full-time hourly employees will receive an annual stipend ninety (90) days from
the date of hire upon successful completion of the new hire probationary period.
3.2.2 Full-time salaried and salaried non-exempt employees are eligible for an annual
stipend ninety (90) days from the date of hire upon successful completion of the new hire
probationary period.
3.2.3 Stipends will be issued on an annual basis, per the District’s fiscal year, to eligible
employees subject to annual budgeting and appropriations by the District Board of
Supervisors.
3.2.4 Stipends are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.
3.2.5 The District at its sole discretion may utilize the services of third party vendors or
agents to distribute, pay, and/or offer stipends for the use of procuring admission passes
to theme parks or other perks offered at a later time.
3.9 Retiree Eligibility and Distribution
3.9.1 Employees who retire at or after age 55 with at least twenty (20) years of continuous
service with the District, or at any age with at least thirty (30) years of continuous service
with the District, will receive the stipend held immediately prior to the time of retirement
at the time of retirement.
3.9.2 Employees who retire prior to age 55, with at least twenty (20) years of continuous
service with the District (but less than thirty years), will receive the stipend held
immediately prior to the time of retirement upon attaining the age of 55.
3.9.3 Employees who retire because of a permanent disability, who are age 45 or older
with 10 or more years of continuous service, will receive the stipend held immediately
prior to the time of retirement at the time of retirement.
3.9.4 The spouse of a deceased retiree with at least twenty (20) years of service will
continue to be eligible for the annual stipend held by the retiree prior to his or her death
until the remarriage or death of the surviving spouse.
3.9.5 The spouse of a deceased employee will continue to be eligible for the annual
stipend held by the employee prior to his or her death until the end of the calendar year
of the employee’s death. The stipend will not be renewed the following year.
3.9.6 Retiree stipends will be paid in January in conjunction with the benefit plan year.
3.9.7 Stipends are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.
3.9.8 The District at its sole discretion may utilize the services of third party vendors or
agents to distribute, pay, and/or offer stipends for the use of procuring admission passes
to theme parks or other perks offered at a later time.

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

View all comments →

flynnibus1 hour ago

District has already dealt with this in their new stipend program to employees... by trying to cover the tax liability in the amount. WDW employees are a completely different situation with regards to the tax liability with their employer giving away its own services to employees. The topic here really is about the prior tax liability - and if the IRS will wave its hand about it, or decide to pursue some or all of it.

mkt2 hours ago

If the CFTOD is the reason that their employees (and potentially also WDW CMs) effectively get a tax hike, there will be torches and pitchforks at their door.

lazyboy97o2 hours ago

A development agreement is not authorization to develop property. It merely sets in place existing development regulations. Without the development agreement Disney is simply subject to the development regulations. And since the district has not even started the process to develop a new comprehensive plan and then change the development regulations, for the time being the development regulations are still the same ones in the development agreement.

flynnibus2 hours ago

gotta love the shotty reporting... "Hundreds of district employees owe over $2M in back taxes" -- No, 2.1M is the total tax liability calculated that is in question. Over 600k of that is actually the district's liability. But that would require actually looking at the material they are reporting on...

Brian2 hours ago

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2023/12/05/hundreds-of-employees-at-former-reedy-creek-district-owe-over-2m-in-back-taxes

mkt2 hours ago

Even though that’s not what they said, why should they invest more in a place where the government is openly adversarial towards them?

Stripes3 hours ago

The obvious hostility, lack of communication, and the level of uncertainty from the new board doesn’t build confidence in the eyes of developers. You see this in certain areas of the country but not at this level.

MandaM3 hours ago

I’m sure many companies are hesitant investing in Florida now that it isn’t a business-friendly state anymore. When the government attempts destroy the biggest tax-paying company in the state, takes over part of that company because they criticized the government, and appoints stooges and cronies to try and make the company’s product fall in line with the government’s values, why are you surprised that business wouldn’t want to invest there? Of course, this is the state whose attorney general says that school libraries are “a forum for government speech” and “not a forum for free expression.” Free speech is well and truly dead in Florida.

Nevermore5254 hours ago

Isn’t it true that right now there isn’t a valid Development Agreement in place for how Disney can utilize the land. So other than renovating existing space, expansion seems to be off the table until a new agreement is in place, or am I interpreting that wrong? Disney didn’t invalidate any development agreements, the legislature/CFTOD did. Any park related expansion would also require coordinating with expansion of utilities and services and thus far this board doesn’t seem to be willing to do more than the minimum for its constituents.

James Alucobond4 hours ago

It doesn't say that. It says that existing plans to invest may be derailed or disrupted by the current board, which is not necessarily due to Disney's unwillingness. Perhaps just incompetence on the part of the board.

LittleBuford4 hours ago

You missed the “and we remain committed …” part, it seems.

Brian4 hours ago

Love that. "Do what we say or we won't invest in WDW anymore." What a joke.

lazyboy97o8 hours ago

This is the sort of stance they should have taken in the first place.

Stripes8 hours ago

Statement from Disney Spokesperson: This report is an exercise in revisionist history. It is neither objective nor credible, and only seeks to advance CFTOD’s interests in its wasteful litigation that could derail investment within the district. Further, it does not change the fact that the CFTOD board was appointed by the governor to punish Disney for exercising its Constitutional right to free speech. This report also comes on the heels of numerous reports in the media which have raised legitimate concerns around the governance of the district under its new leadership. While the board may wish to undermine Disney’s ability to continue investing in the region, we are extremely proud of our impact on the Central Florida economy over the past half-century and we remain committed to maintaining the highest quality experience for the tens of millions of guests who visit Walt Disney World each year. Source: https://blogmickey.com/2023/12/desantis-oversight-district-accuses-disney-of-bribing-government-employees-disney-calls-report-neither-objective-nor-credible/