D
↩ replying to wogwogI just paid 15 bucks for a burger at Hard Rock Cafe, so this looks like a deal to me!
W
PHOTOS - Revised guide map format for Disney Springs with the opening of the Town Center
N
↩ replying to BartattackI was using my iPhone going around the shops, and I had a Blue Shirt on with thin black stripes.
W
↩ replying to wogwogHaha what a joke. I guess this the old prices for people stuck a disney philosophy. Not going to try it as a local when we have BurgerFi Burger21 Fuddruckers and Five Guys all as much cheaper options.
Hopefully Blaze Pizza won't go this route and instead charge the same prices they charge at all of their other stores
J
I get what some people say about this not really looking like it fits the quaint Florida town, but no matter what the titles are, it looks to me like The Landing is really more of the themed looking area. To me Town Center looks more like an expensive shopping area in Italy or Spain.
In any case, I think it looks very nice.
N
Here is my Walkthrough of Town Center to complement the fantastic Walkthrough that @wdwmagic posted yesterday. I thought it would be nice to post anyway because I may have focused on different things. For what it's worth, I was really impressed with everything I saw yesterday.
G
How many fountains did they install??? Holy moly! It's great to see and hear all of that water. Now bring them back in Adventureland! hahaha (I know, the horse is dead, quit beating it) They will make lovely planters! Such great height to some of them :p
M
↩ replying to RandySavageThank you so much for posting this extremely thoughtful and thought-provoking analysis.
I knew something seemed weaker about the overall "feel" as compared with successfully-executed theme park lands, and I was assuming it to be the signage, etc., for retail brand stores. But you've pointed out what in hindsight seems like an obvious difference (and something I often discuss with regard to theme park lands!). Indeed, this should serve as yet another reminder of just how astonishingly impressive the aesthetically unified and accurate architecture is at theme park lands such as WS pavilions, Harambe, Hollywood Blvd., Main Street, and the like.
(That said, DS wasn't meant to be a theme park land - indeed, perhaps it was even intentionally aesthetically differentiated - so, taking it for what it is, it's still very much worth visiting, spending time walking around, etc.)
G
↩ replying to wdwmagicIt would be nice to have a couple drink Kiosks though.
R
↩ replying to Mark Devries^You're welcome. To your point, if they had gone the route of an immersively-themed area (like a Harambe or New Orleans Square, but based on Florida over two centuries), then they would face the challenge of integrating typical tenant signage/interiors so it didn't spoil all that place-making effort (it's no fun seeing the big Cinnabon/Starbucks signs among the awesome exteriors of Port of Entry). Like The Grove in L.A. or the new Shanghai Disneytown, it's a modern lifestyle center (a nice, elaborate one, from the pics) with typical quasi-historic flourishes, but nothing to the point of transporting you to another time/place, as a great themed land strives to do. The actual natural spring area has impressed me the most out of all of it. I think Hangar Bar is very nicely done and could be dropped into an Adventureland or Lost River Delta. Looking forward to what they do with Edison, Observatory, Neverland Tunnels and Walt's Place.
E
From all of the promotional material and videos I have seen, Disney has always mentioned a story behind what they did with Disney Springs (like they always do with any new area), but also if I recall they also say "harkens back to" quiet often when referring to the Disney Springs town. So this is the morden day version of the old Disney Springs of yesterday.
If you look in the Guest Relations building they have a large mural or painting of Disney Springs from a supposed 1950's Expo. It shows the train tracks still in tact and the train running across it. This is clearly not true today as plants are growing on the elevated tracks now.
What this tells me is that those days are the past, and we are in Disney Springs of the present, today. So you have an old style with modern features built on top of it, like you would see in many old cities becoming modernized (like areas of Japan or China have, for example). Here it is:
I also specifically remembering Disney mention why the water tower has a new modern font logo on it, even though the water tower is old, and it had to do with it being modern day or something along those lines. In fact, behind the logo on the tower there is printing on the tower itself... watch this:
R
Looks great, beautiful! Looking so forward to being there when it's all done whenever the time comes I feel is good to visit again.
BUT...with that said, I have to say it, it's not seeming "Disney-ish" enough. You just have the Characters in Flight balloon and maybe some music in the background? As fantastic as it looks, it just looks like a very very nice outdoor outlet mall. It still bothers me that the Springs logo doesn't have a hidden Mickey in it :p
Maybe in person I'll feel completely different. I wanna feel like I'm in WDW...not in an upscale Florida premium outlet.
C
↩ replying to nelsonj3I really need to get a 4k monitor lol
J
↩ replying to Rescue RangerI wonder if that's partly on purpose, and Disney is hoping the place will attract not just tourists, but locals, too. And maybe the locals aren't always in the mood for "Disney-fied" entertainment. As hard as that is for some of us to understand. :)
A
↩ replying to jmmcThis. Not everyone's into character breakfasts and thinks Art of Animation is WDW's best hotel.
They already have a Disney merchandise-focused section of the Springs (Marketplace). This is for, as you say, locals and foreign tourists. The ones who will actually drop a few hundred on a place like Sephora or Under Armour.
Besides, isn't Disney Springs already surrounded by dozens of acres of "Disney-fied" entertainment? ;)