New Disney's Animal Kingdom Paper Map Now Shows DinoLand Replaced by Tropical Americas

10 days ago in "Walt Disney World Park and Resort Maps"

Gallery / 3 Photos
Disney's Animal Kingdom Guide Map - February 2026

Posted: Monday February 2, 2026 6:45am ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

Disney has released a new paper guide map for Animal Kingdom that shows DinoLand U.S.A. completely removed from the park layout. In its place is a large area labeled "Future Home of Tropical Americas."

The updated map is now available at the park entrance. It reflects the closure of DinoLand, which shut down permanently on February 2 after its final day of operation on February 1.

Disney's Animal Kingdom Guide Map - February 2026

What the New Map Shows

The area where DinoLand once sat is now shown as green space with trees. The label "Future Home of Tropical Americas" appears across the entire section.

All DinoLand attractions, dining locations, and shops have been removed from the map. This includes DINOSAUR, Restaurantosaurus, the Dino Institute Shop, and the former Dino-Rama carnival area that closed in early 2025.

The digital map in the My Disney Experience app has also been updated to match the new paper version.

What Comes Next

Construction is already underway on the new 11-acre land replacing DinoLand, with the Tropical Americas expansion is set to open in 2027.

The new land will feature two signature attractions - an Indiana Jones adventure inside a Maya temple and an Encanto ride featuring the Madrigal family. A carousel with hand-carved Disney and Pixar animal characters will also be part of the land, along with one of the largest quick-service restaurants at Disney World.

The Indiana Jones attraction will use the same building and ride system as DINOSAUR, but with an entirely new story and theme. The Encanto ride is being built on the former Dino-Rama footprint and will be a completely new attraction.

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

James Alucobond49 minutes ago

Conceptually, it'd be fine there, but I also think it makes sense to not "waste" the carousel ride type on Discovery Island because it's the flat ride that you can easily sell as the most low-tech and mundane, allowing it to still fit well visually into the villages. Meanwhile, Discovery Island could actually probably handle something that looked a bit more modern and exotic. Honestly, having some flat on DI with three sets of vehicles where one set was themed to real animals, another to ancient animals, and another to imagined animals would be a good way to continue to reference all of those things even as the lands themselves change.

Brer Panther2 hours ago

Does anyone else think the carousel would fit better in Discovery Island?

DrummerxDrummer3 hours ago

I’ve had this cool idea for years where you could take the ride system for 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea (the Tokyo version) and reskin it with avatar’s flora and fauna. The ride vehicles are small seating up to four per vehicle. But think it would still be a cool experience if the right people were behind it.

Timothy_Q3 hours ago

I agree that DAK needs more smaller rides as well, but my point is DAK has no E ticket dark rides for the whole family, so Navi has to carry that weight even though it wasn't designed to do so People expect it to be a headliner like POTC, HM or Rise, when in reality it's meant to be more in line with a (really gorgeous) modern Fantasyland dark ride that's short and sweet

James Alucobond4 hours ago

Maaaybe? At least two of those three are massive E-tickets that would be built with the intention of drawing even more traffic to the park. What you actually need are a few more rides that match or are just a bit below Na'vi in terms of scope and appeal (though hopefully with higher capacity) so that you balance demand with suitably variable wait times. A 60- or 80-minute wait for an E-ticket is way less offensive if you can also blast through a bunch of other things in less than 20 minutes apiece. I honestly find it kind of odd that they've never added a Discovery Island flat ride or a genuine daytime river parade (no, I'm not counting the weird COVID boat cavalcade things). Where Encanto genuinely helps is with having more things to do indoors, but it may actually worsen crowds and wait times.

Timothy_Q5 hours ago

Encanto, a Lion King flume, and a 3rd Pandora ride would fix the Navi issues of wait times and expectations

mattpeto5 hours ago

I like Navi and the East projects should help the standby.

Disney Analyst5 hours ago

Navi is gorgeous. It really just needed to be longer.

Nickm20225 hours ago

Navi river is the ying to the yang that is flight of passage. It is a needed calm in a land full of insanity. but the real issue is it is being used and treated like an e-ticket despite the fact that it's at most a b or c ticket. And the only reason this is happening is simply because it's in a park with currently only 4 other rides. If AK had tropical americas open, plus lets say rides for UP, Black Panther, Lion King, Junglebook, and a whole new land or two in the back themed around North America or the Middle East then navi river would be thought of as a nice calm break you only waited less then 20 minutes for like the people mover. So when you wait 50+ minutes for the ride and are expecting an action ride the warrants a 50 min wait ofc your disappointed. point being Navi is a great ride but is being forced to meet needs it wasn't designed to meet. However I would argue in 20+ years Navi will be considered a way better ride, and will age better w time. And AK needs more filler rides like Navi hence why I think its great Ak is getting the carousel in TA

HMF18 hours ago

I would describe Navi as being a greats setup for an attraction of a similar quality to DL's POTC, but ends suddenly at the point of DL's Pirates Grotto sequence.

UNCgolf18 hours ago

I couldn't disagree more -- I think Na'vi is one of the better rides Disney has built this century (at least at WDW). I don't think it's boring at all; it's relaxing and beautiful (and I've never seen any of the Avatar films so I have zero knowledge of or connection to the IP). Of course it would be better if it was longer and of full of amazing creature animatronics, but I think it's then a D at the very least, if not an E. While I do wish we had that version of the ride, the one that actually exists was never intended to be that. It's an immersive ride down a river in an alien jungle; it doesn't really need to be anything more than that IMO.

Disgruntled Walt19 hours ago

Na'vi River Journey needed some amazing, full-size Pandora creature animatronics. It's boring as heck until you see the dancing lady. Actually, it's still boring even then! As someone who didn't care for Avatar the film at all, Pandora needed to really draw me in, and the outdoor theming did, but the attractions (ESPECIALLY NA'VI) really disappointed me. Flight of Passage was fun, but I did not prioritize riding it on my last trip (which was my first in 8 years). In fact, I didn't set foot in Pandora at all. That's why both of these new attractions in Tropical Americas really have a lot riding on them. I'm hopeful that lots of animatronics will make up for the questionable inclusion of these rides in Animal Kingdom. (It can't really make up for it, because neither Encanto nor Indiana Jones could ever really fit, but it will be an easier pill to swallow.)

UNCgolf21 hours ago

I agree that using screens/projections isn't inherently bad -- Na'vi River Journey is a good example of a ride that uses them almost perfectly -- but I don't think Guardians got it right at all. Using screens/projections does make sense for a roller coaster in a dark warehouse, but the actual execution was poor. People enjoy the ride for the physical motion and the soundtrack; hardly anyone cares about the attempt at story. Shanghai Pirates is much better, although they failed in a few places there as well.

veritas5522 hours ago

yeah, I never subscribed to the view that all screens are necessarily bad or cheap. There's a right place for newer technology -- and Guardians got it right. (So did Shanghai Pirates, albeit with many more practical effects, which you can do with a boat ride, but much less so on a moving coaster.)